Daily Almanac for
Feb 15, 2012
Search: Infoplease Info search tips
Search: Biographies Bio search tips
| Share
 

Singles in the United States

(The ratio of unmarried men per 100 unmarried women in U.S. Metro Areas, 2000 and 2010)

The following tables show the highest and lowest ratio of unmarried men and women living in cities in the United States. Unmarried includes never-married, widowed, and divorced persons, 15 years or older.

Highest Ratio Men to Women

> > >
2000     2010    
Rank Metro Area Ratio RankMetro Area Ratio
1.Jacksonville, N.C.174.781. Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. 111.8
2.Lawton, Okla.112.192. Tempe, Ariz. 108.6
3.Killeen–Temple, TX107.18 3. Wichita Falls, Tex. 107.5
4.State College, Pa.104.91 3. Norfolk, Va. 107.5
5.Fayetteville, N.C.104.48 5. Paradise CDP, Nev. 107.3
6.Clarksville–Hopkinsville, Tenn.–Ky.104.05 6. Columbia, S.C. 106.0
7.Anchoraga, Alaska103.86 7. Salt Lake City, Utah 105.3
8.Lafayette, Ind.103.57 8. Santa Ana, Calif. 103.7
9.Fort Walton Beach, Fla.102.79 8. Costa Mesa, Calif. 103.7
10.Reno, Nev.101.98 10. Everett, Wash. 103.5

Lowest Ratio Men to Women

2000     2010    
Rank Metro Area Ratio Rank Metro Area Ratio
1.Florence, S.C.68.97 1. Pembroke Pines, Fla. 85.9
2.Albany, Ga.71.41 2. Jackson, Miss. 86.8
3.Barnstable–Yarmouth, Mass.71.75 3. Miami Gardens, Fla. 87.9
4.Monroe, La.71.81 4. Birmingham, Ala. 88.0
5.Punta Gorda, Fla.73.48 5. Shreveport, La. 88.1
6.Sarasota–Bradenton, Fla.73.98 6. High Point, N.C. 88.5
7.Gadsden, Ala.73.99 7. Winston-Salem, N.C. 88.6
8.Danville, Va.74.24 8. Montgomery, Ala. 88.6
9.Jackson, Tenn.74.25 9. Greensboro, N.C. 88.7
10.Brownsville–Harlingen–San Benito, Tex.74.45 10. Mobile, Ala. 88.8
NOTE: Unmarried includes never-married, widowed, and divorced persons, 15 years or older. Metro Areas defined as places with population of 100,000 or greater. The presence of a military base, college or university, etc. in a metropolitan area may have a significant impact on the size of the ratio.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census; Web: www.census.gov.

Information Please® Database, © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Characteristics of Unmarried Partners and Married Spouses, 2000Marital StatusUnmarried-Partner Households by Sex of Partners and Race and Hispanic Origin of Householder, 2000
    • Cite
    • Print
    • Bookmark

Premium Partner Content
HighBeam Research

Related content from HighBeam Research on: Singles in the United States

SEPARATING DICK AND JANE: SINGLE-SEX PUBLIC EDUCATION UNDER THE WASHINGTON STATE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT (Washington Law Review)

State legislatures.(Minnesota could get single-chamber legislature)(Brief Article) (The Economist (US))

Michigan.(INSIDE POLITICS: ACROSS STATE LINES)(Republican Party (United States) tries to eliminate single business tax)(Brief article) (Campaigns & Elections)

Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada (Journal of Dairy Science)

States search for a single voice: the financial slowdown has been a litmus test of the GCC's ability to offer a regional response to a global shock, but co-ordinated action is still lacking.(GOVERNANCE)(Gulf Cooperation Council) (MEED Middle East Economic Digest)

Two Multistate Outbreaks of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Infections Linked to Beef from a Single Slaughter Facility - United States, 2008 (MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report)

Divide and quit? (Bosnian peace agreement and formation of a single Bosnian state depends on the continuing commitment of US peacekeeping troops)(Brief Article)(Editorial) (The Economist (US))

Understanding the trade-offs of the Canadian health system: Canada spends less money on health care than the United States does. But should the United States embrace a single-payer system?(COMMENTARY) (Healthcare Financial Management)

Largest-ever deep soil-mixing project: Three SR-90 hydraulic rotary rigs and two single-auger rotary rigs (SR70 and SR80) are at work in New Orleans on the biggest deep soil-mixing job ever performed in the United States. (National Driller)

Avoiding surprises when implementing a single quality system: European medical device manufacturers are sometimes surprised to learn that operating ISO 13485 alone is not sufficient to meet United States (US) quality system requirements. This article discusses important considerations for meeting US and European requirements when operating under a single quality system.(regulation and standards column) (Medical Device Technology)

Additional search results provided by HighBeam Research, LLC. © Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.

A free, reliable Q&A site for homework help. Answerplease.com

24 X 7

Private Tutor

Click Here for Details
24 x 7 Tutor Availability
Unlimited Online Tutoring
1-on-1 Tutoring