Daily Almanac for
Jul 5, 2009
Search White Pages
Search: Infoplease Info search tips
Search: Biographies Bio search tips
Encyclopediastates' rights

In the Early Days of the Union

Immediately after the adoption of the Constitution, controversy arose as to how to interpret the enumerated powers granted the federal government. Alexander Hamilton and the Federalist party favored a broad interpretation, which meant a strong central government deriving its authority from implied as well as express powers contained in the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson and his followers, “strict constructionists,” insisted that all powers not specifically granted the federal government be reserved to the states. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, written by Jefferson and James Madison, represent the first formulation of the doctrine of states' rights. The second important manifestation of states' rights occurred in New England among the Federalists in opposition, curiously enough, to Jefferson. His party, while in power, brought about (1803) the Louisiana Purchase, passed the Embargo Act of 1807 and other nonintercourse measures, and later declared war against Great Britain. All of these actions met with resistance in New England, and the War of 1812 finally led to the calling of the Hartford Convention of 1814–15, in which New Englanders officially expressed their hostility to the federal government.

The fight over the constitutionality of the Bank of the United States made the central states—Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Ohio in particular—the next defenders of states' rights. The points at issue here were settled in McCulloch v. Maryland by decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, dominated by John Marshall, whose broad interpretation of the Constitution laid the foundations of strong central government. The doctrine was revived in the conflict between the federal government and Georgia as to which had jurisdiction over Native American tribes within Georgia's boundaries, and Georgia for a time defied the federal administration. Even more acute was the situation that developed in South Carolina in opposition to the tariff acts of 1828 and 1832, when, under the leadership of John C. Calhoun, South Carolina passed its ordinance of nullification. Calhoun's doctrine of absolute state sovereignty was the most extreme of states' rights theories.

Sections in this article:

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2007, Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.

    • Cite
    • Print
    • Bookmark

Premium Partner Content
HighBeam Research

Related content from HighBeam Research on: states' rights: In the Early Days of the Union

It Takes A CU Village-Remnant Of Early Internet 'Portal' Days Continues To Prosper.(credit union) (Credit Union Journal)

A short history of rehab: checking in to rehab is as much of a celebrity right of passage as getting hit on by DJ AM. With every news cycle, another boldface name retires to a posh desert facility while her publicist pleads for privacy. Here now, the dirt on getting clean.(MC BULLETIN: CELEBS, THE WEB, THE STATE OF THE UNION ... BEHOLD, YOUR WATERCOOLER CHEAT SHEET) (Marie Claire)

CUJ Q&A: The Credit Union Association of Oregon's Pamela Leavitt, Who Is In the State Capital Every Day, Talks Taxation.(Interview) (Credit Union Journal)

The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: between political symbolism and legal realism. (Denver Journal of International Law and Policy)

Franchising community shares concerns with Congress: immigration reform, labor union organization, affordable health care among key issues delegates discussed with members of Congress.(SPECIAL REPORT: FRANCHISE APPRECIATION DAY 2007) (Franchising World)

BUILDING A HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER.(for the European Union)(Brief Article) (Europe)

Off the buses.(TRADE UNION RIGHTS--IRAN) (New Internationalist)

Germany: Where Right Meets Left; Socialist? Conservative? In Berlin these days, such labels mean little. Everyone's singing the same tune. (Newsweek International)

'Day Laborers' Claim 'Right' to Loiter (Human Events)

The person behind the persons case; seventy-five years ago this month, the British Privy Council ruled that Canadian women were persons under the law. What sparked this victory for women's rights was the trial of a forgotten Calgary prostitute twelve years earlier. (The Beaver: Exploring Canada's History)

Additional search results provided by HighBeam Research, LLC. © Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.