Thursday, November 29, 1787
To the People of Connecticut
The same thing once more—I am a plain man, of few words;
for this reason perhaps it is, that when I have said a thing I love
to repeat it. Last week I endeavored to evince, that the only
surety you could have for your liberties must be in the nature of
your government; that you could derive no security from bills of
rights, or stipulations, on the subject of a standing army, the liberty
of the press, trial by jury, or on any other subject. Did you
ever hear of an absolute monarchy, where those rights which are
proposed by the pigmy politicians of this day, to be secured by
stipulation, were ever preserved? Would it not be mere trifling
to make any such stipulations, in any absolute monarchy?
On the other hand, if your interest and that of your rulers are
the same, your liberties are abundantly secure. Perhaps the
most secure when their power is most complete. Perhaps a provision
that they should never raise troops in time of peace, might
at some period embarrass the public concerns and endanger the
liberties of the people. It is possible that in the infinite variety
of events, it might become improper strictly to adhere to any one
provision that has ever been proposed to be stipulated. At all
events, the people have always been perfectly safe without any
stipulation of the kind, when the rulers were interested to make
them safe; and never otherwise.
No people can be more secure against any oppression in their
rulers than you are at present; and no rulers can have more supreme
and unlimited authority than your general assembly have.
When you consult on the subject of adopting the new constitution,
you do not enquire whether the powers therein contained
can be safely lodged in any hands whatever. For not only those
very powers, but all other powers, are already in the general assembly.
- - - - The enquiry is, whether Congress is by this new
constitution so formed that a part of the power now in the general
assembly would be as well lodged in Congress. Or, as was
before said, it depends on how far the members are under your
control; and how far their interest and yours are the same; to
which careful attention must be given.