To the Citizens of the State of New York.
In my last number I endeavored to prove that the language of the
article relative to the establishment of the executive of this new
government was vague and inexplicit, that the great powers of the
President, connected with his duration in office would lead to
oppression and ruin. That he would be governed by favorites and
flatterers, or that a dangerous council would be collected from the
great officers of state,—that the ten miles square, if the remarks
of one of the wisest men, drawn from the experience of mankind, may be
credited, would be the asylum of the base, idle, avaricious and
ambitious, and that the court would possess a language and manners
different from yours; that a vice president is as unnecessary, as he
is dangerous in his influence—that the president cannot represent
you because he is not of your own immediate choice, that if you adopt
this government, you will incline to an arbitrary and odious
aristocracy or monarchy the that the president possessed of the power,
given him by this frame of government differs but very immaterially
from the establishment of monarchy in Great Britain, and I warned you
to beware of the fallacious resemblance that is held out to you by the
advocates of this new system between it and your own state
governments.
And here I cannot help remarking, that inexplicitness seems to
pervade this whole political fabric: certainty in political compacts,
which Mr. Coke calls the mother and nurse of repose and
quietness, the want of which induced men to engage in
political society, has ever been held by a wise and free people as
essential to their security; as, on the one hand it fixes barriers
which the ambitious and tyrannically disposed magistrate dare not
overleap, and on the other, becomes a wall of safety to the community
—otherwise stipulations between the governors and governed are
nugatory; and you might as well deposit the important powers of
legislation and execution in one or a few and permit them to govern
according to their disposition and will; but the world is too full of
examples, which prove that to live by one man's will became
the cause of all men's misery. Before the existence of
express political compacts it was reasonably implied that the
magistrate should govern with wisdom and Justice, but mere implication
was too feeble to restrain the unbridled ambition of a bad man, or
afford security against negligence, cruelty, or any other defect of
mind. It is alledged that the opinions and manners of the people of
America, are capable to resist and prevent an extension of prerogative
or oppression; but you must recollect that opinion and manners are
mutable, and may not always be a permanent obstruction against the
encroachments of government; that the progress of a commercial society
begets luxury, the parent of inequality, the foe to virtue, and the
enemy to restraint; and that ambition and voluptuousness aided by
flattery, will teach magistrates, where limits are not explicitly
fixed to have separate and distinct interests from the people, besides
it will not be denied that government assimilates the manners and
opinions of the community to it. Therefore, a general presumption that
rulers will govern well is not a sufficient security.—You are then
under a sacred obligation to provide for the safety of your posterity,
and would you now basely desert their interests, when by a small share
of prudence you may transmit to them a beautiful political patrimony,
that will prevent the necessity of their travelling through seas of
blood to obtain that, which your wisdom might have secured:—It is a
duty you owe likewise to your own reputation, for you have a great
name to lose; you are characterised as cautious, prudent and jealous
in politics; whence is it therefore, that you are about to precipitate
yourselves into a sea of uncertainty, and adopt a system so vague, and
which has discarded so many of your valuable rights.—Is it because
you do not believe that an American can be a tyrant? If this be the
case you rest on a weak basis; Americans are like other men in similar
situations, when the manners and opinions of the community are changed
by the causes I mentioned before, and your political compact
inexplicit, your posterity will find that great power connected with
ambition, luxury, and flattery, will as readily produce a Caesar,
Caligula, Nero, and Domitian in America, as the same causes did in the
Roman empire.
But the next thing to be considered in conformity to my plan,
is the first article of this new government, which comprises the
erection of the house of representatives and senate, and prescribes
their various powers and objects of legislation. The most general
objections to the first article, are that biennial elections for
representatives are a departure from the safe democratical principles—
of annual ones—that the number of representatives are too few; that
the apportionment and principles of increase are unjust; that no
attention has been paid to either the numbers or property in each
state in forming the senate; that the mode in which they are appointed
and their duration, will lead to the establishment of an aristocracy;
that the senate and president are improperly connected, both as to
appointments, and the making of treaties, which are to become the
supreme law of the land; that the judicial in some measure, to-wit, as
to the trial of impeachments, is placed in the senate, a branch of the
legislative, and some times a branch of the executive: that Congress
have the improper power of making or altering the regulations
prescribed by the different legislatures, respecting the time, place,
and manner of holding elections for representatives, and the time and
manner of choosing senators; that standing armies may be established,
and appropriation of money made for their support for two years; that
the militia of the most remote state may be marched into those states
situated at the opposite extreme of this continent; that the slave
trade is, to all intents and purposes permanently established; and a
slavish capitation, or poll-tax, may at any time be levied—these
are some of the many evils that will attend the adoption of this
government.
But with respect to the first objection, it may be remarked that
a well digested democracy has this advantage over all others, to wit,
that it affords to many the opportunity to be advanced to the supreme
command, and the honors they thereby enjoy fill them with a desire of
rendering themselves worthy of them; hence this desire becomes part of
their education, is matured m manhood, and produces an ardent
affection for their country, and it is the opinion of the great
Sidney, and Montesquieu that this is in a great measure produced by
annual election of magistrates.
If annual elections were to exist in this government, and
learning and information to become more prevalent, you never will want
men to execute whatever you could design—Sidney observes "that
a well governed state is as fruitful to all good purposes as the seven
headed serpent is said to have been in evil; when one head is cut off,
many rise up in the place of it." He remarks further, that
"it was also thought, that free cities by frequent elections of
magistrates became nurseries of great and able men, every man
endeavoring to excel others, that he might be advanced to the honor he
had no other title to, than what might arise from his merit, or
reputation," but the framers of this perfect
government, as it is called, have departed from this
democratical principle, and established bi-ennial elections for the
house of representatives, who are to be chosen by the people, and
sextennial for the senate, who are to be chosen by the legislatures of
the different states, and have given to the executive the
unprecedented power of making temporary senators, in case of
vacancies, by resignation or otherwise, and so far forth establishing
a precedent for virtual representation (though in fact their original
appointment is virtual) thereby influencing the choice of the
legislatures, or if they should not be so complaisant as to conform to
his appointment—offence will be given to the executive and the
temporary members will appear ridiculous by rejection; this temporary
member, during his time of appointment, will of course act by a power
derived from the executive, and for, and under his immediate
influence.
It is a very important objection to this government, that the
representation consists of so few; too few to resist the influence of
corruption, and the temptation to treachery, against which all
governments ought to take precautions—how guarded you have been on
this head, in your own state constitution, and yet the number of
senators and representatives proposed for this vast continent, does
not equal those of your own state; how great the disparity, if you
compare them with the aggregate numbers in the United States. The
history of representation in England, from which we have taken our
model of legislation, is briefly this: before the institution of
legislating by deputies, the whole free part of the community usually
met for that purpose; when this became impossible by the increase of
numbers the community was divided into districts, from each of which
was sent such a number of deputies as was a complete representation of
the various numbers and orders of citizens within them; but can it be
asserted with truth, that six men can be a complete and full
representation of the numbers and various orders of the people in this
state? Another thing [that] may be suggested against the small number
of representatives is, that but few of you will have the chance of
sharing even in this branch of the legislature; and that the choice
will be confined to a very few; the more complete it is, the better
will your interests be preserved, and the greater the opportunity you
will have to participate in government, one of the principal
securities of a free people; but this subject has been so ably and
fully treated by a writer under the signature of Brutus, that I shall
content myself with referring you to him thereon, reserving further
observations on the other objections I have mentioned, for my future
numbers.
Cato.