The Expense of the New Government
Abstract
An unsigned essay from The Connecticut Journal, October 17, 1787.
by
. . A large representation has ever been esteemed by the best
whigs in Great Britain the best barrier against bribery and corruption. And yet
we find a British king, having the disposition of all places, civil and
military, and an immense revenue SQUEEZED out of the very mouths of his wretched
subjects, is able to corrupt the parliament, to vote him any supplies he
demands, to support armies, to defend the prerogatives of his crown, and carry
fire and sword by his fleets and armies; to desolate whole provinces in the
eastern world, to aggrandize himself, and satisfy the avarice of his tyrannical
subjects.
No wonder our American ambassador, struck with the brilliancy of
the British court [John Adams], where everything around St. James's wears the
appearance of wealth, ease and plenty, should imagine a three branched
legislature only can produce these effects, and make the subjects happy, should
write a book in favor of such a government, and send it over for the
illumination of this western world. If this is the sole fruit of his embassy,
America will not canonize him for a saint on account of his services, when they
have experienced the consequences of such a kind of government as be has planned
out. In order to have formed a right judgment, he should have looked into the
ditches which serve for graves for many of the human race—under hedges which
serve as dreary habitations for the living; into the cottages of the poor and
miserable, and critically examine with how much parsimony the mechanics, the day
laborers, cottagers and villagers live in order to support their high pampered
lords—before he had wrote a book to persuade his country to pursue the same road
to greatness, splendor and glory, and have reflected in his own mind, whether he
could wish to see that country which gave him birth reduced to the same
situation.…
Now I submit it to the good sense of the people of these states,
whether it is prudent we should make so liberal and extensive a grant of power
and property to any body of men in these United States, before they have ever
informed the public, the amount of the public debt, or what the annual expenses
of the federal government is, or will be. It is now almost five years since the
peace. Congress has employed thirteen commissioners, at 1500 dollars per annum,
as I am informed, to settle the public accounts, and we know now no more what
the national debt is, than at the first moment of their appointment. Nor do we
know any more what is the amount of the annual expenses of the federal
government, than we do of the empire of China. To grant therefore such an ample
power of taxation, and the right of soil, to the amount of millions, upon the
recommendation of this honorable Convention, without either knowing the amount
of the national debt, or the annual expenses of government, would not argue, in
my opinion, the highest degree of prudence.