A Primer on Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions, Domestic Partnerships, and Defense of Marriage Acts
Learn about the differences among same-sex marriage, civil unions, and domestic partnerships, plus an overview of the Defense of Marriage Act. The controversial topic of gay marriage has become an important part of the American political landscape, state- and country-wide. Plus, you can find a timeline of the American gay rights movement, which will introduce you to the many struggles the gay and lesbian community have experienced.
What's the Difference?
The most significant difference between marriage and civil unions (or domestic partnerships) is that only marriage offers federal benefits and protections.
According to the federal government's General Accounting Office (GAO), more than 1,100 rights and protections are conferred to U.S. citizens upon marriage. Areas affected include Social Security benefits, veterans' benefits, health insurance, Medicaid, hospital visitation, estate taxes, retirement savings, pensions, family leave, and immigration law.
Because same-sex marriages in Massachusetts and California, civil unions, and domestic partnerships are not federally recognized, any benefits available at the state or local level are subject to federal taxation. For example, a woman whose health insurance covers her female partner must pay federal taxes on the total employer cost for that insurance.
Federal Legislation: DOMA
In 1996, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Clinton. DOMA allows each state to choose whether or not to recognize a same-sex union that is recognized in another state—thus allowing a choice of whether to enforce the U.S. Constitution's “full faith and credit” clause (which requires each state to recognize the laws and legal contracts of other states) in this matter.
However, DOMA has yet to be fully tested in the courts. Because the U.S. Constitution does not give Congress the power to limit the scope of the “full faith and credit” clause—only to enforce its application—the constitutionality of DOMA has not been proven.
Since DOMA was passed in 1996, almost every state has taken advantage of the opportunity it offers by either enacting legislation or amending its state constitution to declare same-sex marriages invalid, even for couples married in a state where such marriages are licensed.
In addition to preventing marriage licenses from being issued to opposite-sex couples, state legislation may be used in efforts to overrule existing state or local rights and protections for same-sex couples and their children.
Proposed Federal Marriage Amendment
Because the constitutionality of DOMA and state legislation against same-sex marriage has yet to be fully tested by the courts, relying on legislation to settle the issue of same-sex marriage is of questionable use. As a result, text for a proposed constitutional amendment known as the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) has been introduced to Congress on multiple occasions since 2002.
The amendment would define marriage as the union of a man and a woman and could be used to overrule state or local protections for same-sex couples and their children. To become part of the U.S. Constitution, the FMA would need to be approved by two thirds of Congress and then ratified by three fourths of state legislatures.
See also: Policies Pertaining to Same-Sex Marriages, Civil Unions, and Domestic Partnerships, which lists the status of legislation in each state and in countries around the world.
Information Please® Database, © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
More on Primer on Same-Sex Marriage Civil Unions Domestic Partnerships and Defense of Marriage Acts from Infoplease: