Daily Almanac for
Sep 6, 2008
Search White Pages
Info search tips
Bio search tips

Child Poverty and Family Income

Childhood poverty has both immediate and lasting negative effects. Children in low-income families fare more poorly than children in more affluent families in the areas of economic security, health, and education. Children living in families that are poor are more likely than children living in other families to have difficulty in school, to become teen parents, and, as adults, to earn less and be unemployed more. The child poverty rate provides important information about the percentage of U.S. children whose current life circumstances are hard and whose futures are potentially limited as a result of their family's low income.

  • In 1996, 20% of American children lived in families with cash incomes below the poverty line.
  • The percentage of children in poverty has stayed near or slightly above 20% since 1981.1
  • Children under age 6 are more often found in families with incomes below the poverty line than children ages 6 to 17. In 1996, 23% of children under age 6 lived in poverty, compared to 18% of older children.
  • Children with two married parents are much less likely to be living in poverty than children living only with their mothers. In 1996, 10% of children in two-parent families were living in poverty, compared to 49% in female-householder families.
  • This contrast by family structure is especially pronounced among certain racial and ethnic minorities. For example, in 1996, 14% of black children in married-couple families lived in poverty, compared to 58% of black children in female-householder families. Twenty-nine percent of Hispanic children in married-couple families lived in poverty, compared to 67% in female-householder families.
  • Most children in poverty are white and non-Hispanic. However, the proportion of black or Hispanic children in poverty is much higher than the proportion for white, non-Hispanic children. In 1996, 10% of white, non-Hispanic children lived in poverty, compared to 40% of black children and 40% of Hispanic children.
  • In 1996, 8% of all children lived in families with incomes less than half the poverty level, or $8,018 a year for a family of four, while 31% of children lived in families with incomes less than 150% of the poverty level, or $24,054 a year for a family of four.

The full distribution of the income of children's families is important, not just the percentage in poverty. Knowing that more and more children live in affluent families tells us that a growing proportion of America's children enjoy economic well-being. The growing gap between rich and poor children suggests that poor children may experience more relative deprivation even if the percentage of poor children is holding steady.

  • In 1996, children living in families with medium income made up the largest share of children by income group (34%). There were similar percentages of children living with low income and with high income, 23% and 24%, respectively.
  • Since 1980, the percentage of children living in families with medium income has fallen from 41% to 34% in 1996, while the percentage of children living in families with high income and the percentage of children in extreme poverty have risen, from 17% to 24% and from 7% to 8%, respectively. The data indicate that there has been an increase in income disparity among children.
1. The child poverty rate for 1981 was 19.5%. Source: Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics (www.childstats.gov), America's Children 1998.

Information Please® Database, © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Manufacturing Industries—Weekly Earnings and Hours Poverty and IncomeTemporary Assistance for Needy Families, Percent of U.S. Population, 1960–2000
    • Cite
    • Print
    • Bookmark

Premium Partner Content
HighBeam Research

Related content from HighBeam Research on: Child Poverty and Family Income

Quebec promises $550 million to families with children.(Poverty & Income Security)(Brief Article) (Community Action)

Rebuilding the American dream: the imperative of developing a new anti-poverty agenda.(low-income families ) (Conscience)

Poor families equal poor children: given the extent of poverty in Canada, particularly among single-parent families, it follows that many of the victims are children.(POVERTY--CHILDREN) (Canada and the World Backgrounder)

EITC boosts local economies; for 31 years, the federal Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) has been a fixture in the nation's arsenal of anti-poverty programs. In addition to bringing more children above the poverty line than any other federal program, the EITC has become a formidable and efficient generator of economic stimulus for U.S. cities. (Partners in Community and Economic Development)

Child poverty and family structure in Canada, 1981-1997. (Journal of Comparative Family Studies)

Health status and income: the impact of poverty on child health. (Journal of School Health)

Job does not always end child poverty, Ontario group claims.(CHILD & FAMILY) (Community Action)

Preparing Early Childhood Educators To Serve Children and Families Living in Poverty: A National Survey of Undergraduate Programs (Journal of Research in Childhood Education)

Preparing early childhood educators to serve children and families living in poverty: a national survey of undergraduate programs. (Journal of Research in Childhood Education)

Billion kids in severe poverty.(Child & Family) (Community Action)

Additional search results provided by HighBeam Research, LLC. © Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.