Daily Almanac for
May 26, 2012
Search: Infoplease Info search tips
Search: Biographies Bio search tips
| Share
 
Encyclopedia

Sherman Antitrust Act

Sherman Antitrust Act, 1890, first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit trusts; it was named for Senator John Sherman. Prior to its enactment, various states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. Finally opposition to the concentration of economic power in large corporations and in combinations of business concerns led Congress to pass the Sherman Act. The act, based on the constitutional power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, declared illegal every contract, combination (in the form of trust or otherwise), or conspiracy in restraint of interstate and foreign trade. A fine of $5,000 and imprisonment for one year were set as the maximum penalties for violating the act.

The Sherman Act authorized the federal government to institute proceedings against trusts in order to dissolve them, but Supreme Court rulings prevented federal authorities from using the act for some years. As a result of President Theodore Roosevelt's “trust-busting” campaigns, the Sherman Act began to be invoked with some success, and in 1904 the Supreme Court upheld the government in its suit for dissolution of the Northern Securities Company. The act was further employed by President Taft in 1911 against the Standard Oil trust and the American Tobacco Company.

In the Wilson administration the Clayton Antitrust Act (1914) was enacted to supplement the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was set up (1914). Antitrust action sharply declined in the 1920s, but under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt new acts supplementary to the Sherman Antitrust Act were passed (e.g., the Robinson-Patman Act), and antitrust action was vigorously resumed. As a result of a suit filed in 1974 under the Sherman Antitrust Act, the American Telephone and Telegraph (AT&T) monopoly was broken up in 1982.

The Hart-Scoss-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act (1976) made it easier for regulators to investigate mergers for antitrust violations, but few mergers were blocked during the merger boom of the 1980s, when the FTC and Justice Dept. adopted a looser interpretation of antitrust legislation. By the 1990s, still a time of large corporate mergers, the FTC became more litigious in antitrust actions, and the Justice Dept. aggressively pursued the Microsoft Corp. (see Gates, Bill). Antitrust legislation is primarily regulated by the Antitrust Division of the Dept. of Justice and the FTC. U.S. corporations with international operations also face antitrust scrutiny from European Union regulators.

See R. Posner, Anti-Trust Law (1976); R. Bork, The Antitrust Paradox (1978).

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2007, Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.

    • Cite
    • Print
    • Bookmark

More on Sherman Antitrust Act from Infoplease:

See more Encyclopedia articles on: U.S. History


Premium Partner Content
HighBeam Research

Related content from HighBeam Research on: Sherman Antitrust Act

Is it predatory pricing - or not? (violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act) (Law) (Column) (Folio: the Magazine for Magazine Management)

Copyright and antitrust: the effects of the Digital Performance Rights in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 in foreign markets. (Federal Communications Law Journal)

Calling their shots: miffed minor leaguers, the steroid scandal, and examining the use of section 1 of the Sherman Act to hold MLB accountable.(Major League Baseball) (Albany Law Review)

ACLI in major shift on McCarran. (McCarran-Ferguson Act; American Council of Life Insurance adopts new antitrust position) (National Underwriter Life & Health-Financial Services Edition)

Extraterritorial application of U.S. antitrust law: What is a "direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseesable effect" under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act? (Texas International Law Journal)

FDUPTA for civil antitrust: additional conduct, party, and geographic coverage; state actions for consumer restitution.(Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act ) (Florida Bar Journal)

IN THE WAKE OF EMPAGRAN-LIGHTS OUT ON FOREIGN ACTIVITY FALLING UNDER SHERMAN ACT JURISDICTION? COURTS CARVE OUT A PREVAILING STANDARD (Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law)

How MFN clauses used in the health care industry unreasonably restrain trade under the Sherman Act.(most favored nations) (Journal of Law and Health)

Avoiding Antitrust Issues (Biopharm International)

Avoiding antitrust liability. (Association Management)

Additional search results provided by HighBeam Research, LLC. © Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.

A free, reliable Q&A site for homework help. Answerplease.com

24 X 7

Private Tutor

Click Here for Details
24 x 7 Tutor Availability
Unlimited Online Tutoring
1-on-1 Tutoring