| Share
 

Sherman Antitrust Act

Sherman Antitrust Act, 1890, first measure passed by the U.S. Congress to prohibit trusts; it was named for Senator John Sherman. Prior to its enactment, various states had passed similar laws, but they were limited to intrastate businesses. Finally opposition to the concentration of economic power in large corporations and in combinations of business concerns led Congress to pass the Sherman Act. The act, based on the constitutional power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, declared illegal every contract, combination (in the form of trust or otherwise), or conspiracy in restraint of interstate and foreign trade. A fine of ,000 and imprisonment for one year were set as the maximum penalties for violating the act.

The Sherman Act authorized the federal government to institute proceedings against trusts in order to dissolve them, but Supreme Court rulings prevented federal authorities from using the act for some years. As a result of President Theodore Roosevelt's "trust-busting" campaigns, the Sherman Act began to be invoked with some success, and in 1904 the Supreme Court upheld the government in its suit for dissolution of the Northern Securities Company. The act was further employed by President Taft in 1911 against the Standard Oil trust and the American Tobacco Company.

In the Wilson administration the Clayton Antitrust Act (1914) was enacted to supplement the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was set up (1914). Antitrust action sharply declined in the 1920s, but under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt new acts supplementary to the Sherman Antitrust Act were passed (e.g., the Robinson-Patman Act), and antitrust action was vigorously resumed. As a result of a suit filed in 1974 under the Sherman Antitrust Act, the American Telephone and Telegraph (AT&T) monopoly was broken up in 1982.

The Hart-Scoss-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act (1976) made it easier for regulators to investigate mergers for antitrust violations, but few mergers were blocked during the merger boom of the 1980s, when the FTC and Justice Dept. adopted a looser interpretation of antitrust legislation. By the 1990s, still a time of large corporate mergers, the FTC became more litigious in antitrust actions, and the Justice Dept. aggressively pursued the Microsoft Corp. (see Gates, Bill). Antitrust legislation is primarily regulated by the Antitrust Division of the Dept. of Justice and the FTC. U.S. corporations with international operations also face antitrust scrutiny from European Union regulators.

See R. Posner, Anti-Trust Law (1976); R. Bork, The Antitrust Paradox (1978).

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.

More on Sherman Antitrust Act from Infoplease:

See more Encyclopedia articles on: U.S. History


Premium Partner Content
HighBeam Research

Related content from HighBeam Research on: Sherman Antitrust Act

Antitrust health care law - no agreement between alleged Sherman Act conspirators results in upholding of summary judgment - Omnicare, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. (Journal of Health & Biomedical Law)

In private antitrust action against two leading auction houses, Second Circuit holds that Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act of 1982 did not overrule prior circuit law on applicability of Sherman Act to antitrust violations committed abroad. (International Law Update)

In class action suit by vitamin buyers against vitamin distributors, U.S. Supreme Court holds that Sherman Act does not reach foreign antitrust activity occurring within and outside United States that causes injury to foreign customer where that injury is independent of any injury to domestic customer. (International Law Update)

Second Circuit dismisses claim for excessive service fees for EURO currency exchanges holding that Sherman Act does not reach foreign antitrust activity occurring within and outside United States that causes injury to foreign customer where that injury is independent of any injury to domestic customer. (International Law Update)

Hospital successfully defended Sherman Antitrust suit. (Hospital Law's Regan Report)

As result of Sherman Act investigations of international vitamin cartel, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice announces plea agreements by German and Swiss executives of BASF and Hoffman-LaRoche that involve prison sentences and substantial fines.(Brief Article) (International Law Update)

Copyright and Antitrust: The Effects of the Digital Performance Rights in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 in Foreign Markets (Federal Communications Law Journal)

ACLI in major shift on McCarran. (McCarran-Ferguson Act; American Council of Life Insurance adopts new antitrust position) (National Underwriter Life & Health-Financial Services Edition)

In action by Norwegian oil drilling company against service providers in North Sea, Fifth Circuit concludes that Sherman Act and FTAIA did not apply to foreign conduct because domestic effect of anticompetitive conduct did not "give rise" to antitrust claim. (International Law Update)

Calling Their Shots: Miffed Minor Leaguers, the Steroid Scandal, and Examining the Use of Section 1 of the Sherman Act to Hold MLB Accountable (Albany Law Review)

Additional search results provided by HighBeam Research, LLC. © Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.

24 X 7

Private Tutor

Click Here for Details
24 x 7 Tutor Availability
Unlimited Online Tutoring
1-on-1 Tutoring