Effect on Imports, Exports, and GDP
Recall the formula for gross domestic product, C + I + G + (Ex - Im). The expression (Ex - Im) equals net exports, which may be either positive or negative. If net exports are positive, the nation's GDP increases. If they are negative, GDP decreases. All nations want their GDP to be higher rather than lower, so all nations want their net exports to be positive. (Of course it is not possible for all nations to have positive net exports because one or more nations must import more than they export if the others export more than they import.)
Returning to our example of the United States and Mexico, here is the sequence of events I just described and the impact on trade and GDP:
The price of the peso in dollars—the dollar-peso exchange rate—is determined by U.S. demand for Mexican goods and Mexican demand for U.S. goods. However, when the exchange rate changes, that affects the price of each country's goods. That price change affects each country's demand for the other's goods in ways that tend to reverse the initial trend.
This mechanism depends on floating exchange rates. If exchange rates are not permitted to respond to the forces of supply and demand, these automatic adjustments cannot occur. Given the high levels of international trade in the world today, and the “managed float” nature of exchange rates, the economies of most nations are intertwined in various ways. Let's examine some of those ways.
The Balance of Payments
The U.S. balance of payments includes a current account, which summarizes imports and exports and a capital account, which summarizes forgiveness of debts, transfers of goods or financial assets accompanying migrants, and other transfers of assets. It also includes a financial account, which summarizes U.S. and foreign investment in fixed assets, securities, and other financial assets, and intangible assets. The current account should balance out to zero against the sum of the capital and the financial accounts.
The balance of international payments, commonly known as the balance of payments, is the overall accounting of a nation's international economic activity. It is a statement summarizing the transactions that took place between a nation and the rest of the world, usually over a calendar quarter or year. It shows the sum of all the transactions between the individuals, businesses, and government agencies of the nation and those of the rest of the world.
Transactions are recorded as debits and credits in the balance of payments. Transactions that cause money to flow into the country (inflows) are credits, and those that cause money to leave the country (outflows) are debits.
For example, if the U.S. exports a cement mixer to Brazil, the transaction is a credit to the U.S. balance of payments and a debit to Brazil's balance of payments. If Malaysia borrows $1.5 billion from the U.S. government, the transaction is a debit to the U.S. balance of payments and a credit to Malaysia's. However, when Malaysia makes its first payment on the principal and interest on the loan, it is a credit to the U.S. balance of payments and a debit to Malaysia's.
The balance of payments statement divides international transactions into three accounts: the current account, capital account, and financial account, as follows:
Although economists used to point out that services generally were not exported—haircuts were the favorite example—that has changed. The vast majority of international trade is still in goods, but trade in services has grown considerably over the past two decades. Categories of services exported and imported include transportation, financial, consulting, engineering, and telecommunications services.
Each of these three accounts—the current account, the capital account, and the financial account—is summed separately. The sum of the current account should balance with the sum of the capital account plus the financial account. Thus, the current account should balance out to zero against the capital and financial accounts. In practice, the balance is close to zero relative to the sums involved, but is rarely exactly zero. This is due to statistical discrepancies, accounting conventions, and exchange rate movements that change the recorded value of transactions.
Why should the current account balance out to zero against the capital and financial accounts?
Because when the United States imports more goods and services than it exports, the result is a current account deficit. The United States must finance that current account deficit, either by international borrowing or by selling more capital assets than it buys internationally. Conversely, when the United States exports more that it imports, its trading partners must finance their current account deficits, either by borrowing or by selling more capital assets than they purchased.
Table 18.2 shows the U.S. balance of payments for 2001.
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, International Accounts Data
The deficit on the merchandise account, commonly known as the trade deficit, accounts for almost all of the deficit on the capital account. It is a deficit in exports of goods that causes the U.S. trade deficit. In 2001, the United States imported almost 60 percent more goods than it exported (because $1,146 - $719 = $427 and $427 ÷ $719 = .59). However, the United States runs a surplus in services, exporting $279 billion and importing $210 billion of services in 2001.
A trade deficit occurs when, during a certain period, a nation imports more goods and services than it exports. A trade surplus occurs when a nation exports more goods and services than it imports.
As the financial account shows, the current account deficit is offset by the amount of foreign investment in the United States, which exceeds U.S. foreign investment. While America does a lot of foreign investment—placing $371 billion abroad in 2001—the rest of the world invests very heavily in the United States, to the tune of $753 billion in that year. So America's ability to attract foreign investment helps to finance its appetite for imports.
The United States has run a merchandise trade deficit since 1976, although it typically runs a surplus in services. The merchandise trade deficit rose from $36 billion in 1982 to a peak of $160 billion in 1987. In the recession year of 1991, the trade deficit stood at $71 billion, but the run-up during the 1990s was particularly strong. During that period, the United States enjoyed a vigorous economic expansion while the economies of Europe and Asia languished. By 2000, the merchandise trade deficit had grown to $434 billion. In 2001, which included three quarters of contraction, the trade deficit still reached $358 billion.
Excerpted from The Complete Idiot's Guide to Economics © 2003 by Tom Gorman. All rights reserved including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Used by arrangement with Alpha Books, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.