Daily Almanac for
Nov 11, 2009
Search White Pages
Search: Infoplease Info search tips
Search: Biographies Bio search tips
Encyclopediacourt system in the United States

State Court Systems

The system of state courts is quite diverse; virtually no two states have identical judiciaries. In general, however, the states, like the federal government, have a hierarchically organized system of general courts along with a group of special courts. The lowest level of state courts, often known generically as the inferior courts, may include any of the following: magistrate court, municipal court, justice of the peace court, police court, traffic court, and county court. Such tribunals, often quite informal, handle only minor civil and criminal cases. More serious offenses are heard in superior court, also known as state district court, circuit court, and by a variety of other names. The superior courts, usually organized by counties, hear appeals from the inferior courts and have original jurisdiction over major civil suits and serious crimes such as grand larceny. It is here that most of the nation's jury trials occur. The highest state court, usually called the appellate court, state court of appeals, or state supreme court, generally hears appeals from the state superior courts and, in some instances, has original jurisdiction over particularly important cases. A number of the larger states, such as New York, also have intermediate appellate courts between the superior courts and the state's highest court. Additionally, a state may have any of a wide variety of special tribunals, usually on the inferior court level, including juvenile court, divorce court, probate court, family court, housing court, and small-claims court. In all, there are more than 1,000 state courts of various types, and their judges, who may be either appointed or elected, handle the overwhelming majority of trials held in the United States each year.

Sections in this article:

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2007, Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.

    • Cite
    • Print
    • Bookmark

Premium Partner Content
HighBeam Research

Related content from HighBeam Research on: court system in the United States: State Court Systems

Who are we? Americans need to study up on the United States.(Cover story) (WR News, Senior Edition (including Science Spin))

Termination by the European Commission of proceedings to investigate trade barriers - application for compensation by EC exporters adversely affected by U.S. surcharge authorized by WTO - legality of selective sanctioning by the United States. (American Journal of International Law)

A liberal theocracy: philosophy, theology, and Utah constitutional law.(State Constitutional Commentary: An Interdisciplinary Examination of State Courts, State Constitutional Law, and State Constitutional Adjudication) (Albany Law Review)

Does an Equal Rights Amendment make a difference? (Texas)(State Constitutional Commentary: An Interdisciplinary Examination of State Courts, State Constitutional Law, and State Constitutional Adjudication) (Albany Law Review)

The Supreme Court of Alaska: unique and independent like the people of the last frontier.(State Constitutional Commentary: An Interdisciplinary Examination of State Courts, State Constitutional Law, and State Constitutional Adjudication) (Albany Law Review)

Interpreting the "sexual contract" in Pennsylvania: the motivations and legacy of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Robert A. Berkowitz.(State Constitutional Commentary: An Interdisciplinary Examination of State Courts, State Constitutional Law, and State Constitutional Adjudication) (Albany Law Review)

The Green Mountain boys still love their freedom: criminal jurisprudence of the Vermont Supreme Court.(State Constitutional Commentary: An Interdisciplinary Examination of State Courts, State Constitutional Law, and State Constitutional Adjudication) (Albany Law Review)

A view from the states on stealth tort 'reform': the Bush administration is using the federal rulemaking process as its latest weapon against state tort remedies. A Texas lawmaker tells how this tactic undermines states' authority and frustrates their ability to protect their citizens.(Interview) (Trial)

State comptroller cites need for reform. (Connecticut state comptroller William E. Curry Jr. talks about bookkeeping practices) (Fairfield County Business Journal)

State regulators and pragmatic federalism in the United States, 1889-1945 (Business History Review)

Additional search results provided by HighBeam Research, LLC. © Copyright 2005. All rights reserved.